Today I shared a reflection at Holy Trinity Church Stratford on the proposed Anglican covenant in relation to today’s readings. As one of the church’s 2 synod representatives, I recently participated in the the Waikato Anglican synod debate on the covenant, where a motion affirming the covenant was passed by a slim majority. With the other synod representative, I was invited to speak to today’s service. In my reflection, which I have published below, I explain the purpose of the covenant, compare it with Joshua’s covenant with the Hebrews at Shechem, and illustrate its pertinence in relation to the doctrine of Jesus’ return as King and Judge.
READINGS:
Joshua 24: 1 – 4, 14 – 26
1 Thessalonians 4: 13 – 18
Matthew 25: 1 – 13
Today Jane and I have been asked to report from the 2011 Waikato Diocese Anglican Synod, where I think many would say the most significant matter was the passing of a resolution affirming the proposed Anglican Covenant. Other important motions were also discussed, addressing issues such as abortion, homosexuals and the length of terms in lay leadership.
In our Old Testament reading for today we encounter Joshua’s famous address to the Hebrews at Shechem, long after they have settled in the Promised Land and the Lord has given them victory over their enemies. But though the Hebrews through God were powerful, the Gods of their pagan enemies still held appeal to them.
So Joshua reminds them of God’s delivery of Israel from slavery in Egypt with great signs and wonders, and the Hebrews respond “We will serve the Lord.” And we find that on that day Joshua makes a covenant with this people, reaffirming God’s laws and decrees and setting up a monument to remind them.
Israel at the time of Joshua were not like other nations. They had no king, but were a confederation of 13 tribes. The only authority that bound them together was the revelation of God’s law which Moses had received at Mt Sinai. That and the Levite tribe which served as priests for them.
The Anglican Church is a bit the same. Unlike the Roman Catholic Church, the autonomy and power of our church lies in Dioceses, Synods & Bishops, not with a Pope. We are bound by God’s revelation in the form of the bible, the creeds, the 39 articles and the prayer book. And we are bound by the Anglican order of Bishops, priests and deacons who serve us.
But this makes it difficult when Dioceses, Synods and Bishops in the communion start to do things that other Anglicans consider as contrary to Anglicanism. The most well-known examples are the ordination of homosexuals, and the ordination of priests by one Bishop to work in a Diocese that belongs to another bishop. These examples have caused such great offence and consternation within the church that at the last big meeting of Bishops, the Lambeth conference, 3 bishops were not invited and a great number of bishops didn’t even attend. And there are many other matters that get Anglicans hot and bothered from time to time.
Nobody wants to see broken relationships and such disunity in our church. Indeed, unity is one of Anglicanism’s greatest hallmarks. Not unity to the very last detail like most other churches, but certainly unity in relation to the very basics of the life of our church – like affirmation of the creeds, of scripture as authoritative, and of the authority of the Archbishop of Canterbury and our various church councils. Anglicanism is enriched by the diversity of views that can be held on the authority of these traditions – a diversity which can be happily tolerated. But what do we do when that diversity becomes too wide and causes serious dissension in our church?
Like Joshua with the Israelites, many bishops and lay leaders in the church have deemed that our shared revelation and priesthood aren’t enough – they too have drawn up a covenant that they hope the various dioceses and provinces can sign up to, as a means of pledging our commitment to this unity, so we have accountability for our actions. And so we have the Anglican Covenant. This covenant affirms the creeds, the scripture as authoritative, and the authority of the Archbishop of Canterbury and our various church councils. And it is hoped by many to bring unity and accountability as the Anglican Church addresses those issues of offence and consternation rife in our communion.
It is important to note this is not just about gays. It is not just about African priests running amuck in North America. It is about those important truths and traditions which unite us as a church, and our willingness to allow this to steer us in our day-to-day judgments.
Our 2 New Testament readings today remind us to be ready for Jesus’ return as King, when he comes to bring justice to the whole world. The reading from 1 Thessalonians illustrates what this second coming will be like, in terms which seem fanciful to a world saturated by science & technology, and apparently devoid of the mystical and supernatural:
For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever.
Yet this is a picture which resonates with testaments old and new, which continuously speak of the new heavens and the new earth into which the dead are raised. This is a picture which resonates with the gospel of Christ’s resurrection and ascension in bodily form, and his evident ability to defy the laws of physics, which after all he created himself.
Perhaps, then, our gospel reading particularly applies to today’s generations, who have waited centuries for this wondrous return. The parable of the 10 virgins, 5 of whom underestimated how long they would need to keep their light burning. Whose oil ran out and as a result weren’t recognized when the King came.
A lot of the theological conflict in our church in recent history has been between those who await our Lord’s coming and pray for it with our liturgy every Sunday, and those who a long time ago wrote off the idea.
When our oil runs out then the appeal of pagan Gods and their immediacy becomes all the more powerful. Why hope for the return of a superJesus to make all things right when we could just believe that humanity will become divine and eventually solve all of the world’s problems on our own? Why hope for salvation from sin and death if I can resign that I don’t know what comes after death, and that I’m a good person, – whatever happens I should be alright.
But we as a church, like Israel, are a people who have inherited a story. Whether or not justice comes sooner rather than later, whether or not my merits mean anything to God in his judgment, the revelation we share is less about us and more about Jesus. His Lordship over all creation is central to any biblical reference to Jesus. This is what scripture affirms, what the creeds affirm, what the 39 articles and the book of common prayer affirm.
And so I give thanks for the proposed covenant, and that our diocese had the courage to affirm it.









